| Author |
|
Chuck
New User
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 6
Location: NE U.S.
|
 Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 6:24 pm Post subject: Negative magnetic energy |
 |
|
Negative (North) magnetic energy has been shown to be very effective in eliminating cancer and Positive (South) magnetic energy has been shown to increase the growth of cancer, according to the research of Albert Roy Davis. All magnets have a North pole and a South pole. It is often said that there is no scientific proof that magnetism has any significant effect on our health. That is completely false. Without the magnetic field of the earth every living thing would die. Magnetism is essential to our survival. For example, when dinosaurs roamed the earth the magnetic field surrounding the earth was hundreds of times stronger than it is right now. As the magnetic strength weakened, the type and size of animals on earth changed. There is a direct relationship between the two.
We are continually bombarded by different man-made electromagnetic energies that do affect us, like microwaves, radio waves, 60 CPS AC (that's 30 pulses of North pole energy, and 30 pulses of South pole energy) electricity etc. Imagine the potential lawsuits if the authorities finally admitted that South pole magnetic energy is dangerous, and yet they've done nothing for decades to warn or protect the public from this threat. They would also be admitting that there is a difference between the North and South poles, and though Davis contacted the U.S. government as early as the 1940's to inform them of his discovery, the government still won't acknowledge it, and it isn't taught in government schools either. If they were to concede that it is true now, it would amount to an admission of guilt to a huge deception. No explanation would able to appease the public or repair the damage to our trust and belief in our government. So the bottom line is, don't expect them to confirm this.
If you research North vs. South pole magnetism you'll find that this is correct information, and North pole magnetism can be used to, among other things, help with or eliminate many diseases. By the way, I've read similar things as other people on this site regarding the inability of cancer to survive in an environment rich in oxygen and alkaline in Ph. North pole magnetism increases cellular oxygen and alkalinity in the body and the South pole does just the opposite. Large ceramic type magnets are the best kind for most circumstances, not small ceramic ones or neodymium magnets. The North pole is the South seeking side, meaning it will be attracted to the South pole of another magnet or compass (and repelled by another North pole).
I highly recommend reading the book, "Racketeering in Medicine: The Suppression of Alternatives", by James P. Carter, M.D., Dr. P.H. Carter provides overwhelming evidence of the suppression of alternative medicine. It will be of great assistance in helping you to understand how our medical system truly works. Here are some excerpts from one of the chapters. http://www.banned-books.com/truth-seeker/1994archive/121_2/ts212c.html
Last edited by Chuck on Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:34 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
brainman
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 3042
Location: Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject: Please, give references |
|
|
Hi, please, when posting messages like this one, list your source(s).
Does this mean all South Americans and Africans and Australian and others living south of the equator should move north? (sarcasm intended)
_________________
Jim
Site Administrator and long-term cancer survivor
1992 Astrocytoma grade 2, left motor strip
2005 Recurrence this time said to be an Oligodendoglioma grade 3, same location.
My Story Part 1: http://cancerforums.net/viewtopic.php?p=7350
My Story Part 2: http://cancerforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=8029
Blog http://jimhawkinsport.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chuck
New User
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 6
Location: NE U.S.
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: South pole dangers |
|
|
I told you, Albert Roy Davis discovered that the poles have different effects, and that South pole magnetism is dangerous. Many other researchers have confirmed it. Davis found that when animals were exposed to a South pole magnetic field just prior to conception, their offspring would grow larger and become physically stronger than normal, and North pole exposed animals would grow smaller and become physically weaker than normal. The same is true for most species of plants. South pole magnetism makes them grow larger.
Think about the differences of the two hemispheres of earth. For the most part, animals and plants are larger in the Southern hemisphere. Vegetation is more lush. Venomous animals have more potent venom.
Since the earth's magnetic field is only 1/2 of one gauss right now, the South pole energy won't have a major effect on health. However, in Davis' experiments, he exposed the animals to a 2000 gauss magnetic field, much more powerful than the earth's magnetic field, so the effects are greatly magnified.
South pole exposure after physical maturity has been reached can and does increase strength, but it is very risky and can accelerate the growth of any type of microorganism or abnormal growth in the body too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
brainman
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 3042
Location: Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: Re: Negative magnetic energy |
|
|
Chuck, giving me a name is not enough... list an article in a reputable journal in which "Albert Roy Davis" has published his findings. Give me more information about these "Many other researchers" you talk about.
Finally, the largest animal that has ever lived, lives in both hemispheres... the blue whale. The fact that we in the north have killed off the larger animals that once wived here and have destroyed the large forests that once covered this wonderful land, proves nothing other than our own greed and lack of foresight.
I do not usually enter into this form of debate with others using this site. However, you have not shown me any validity to your premise other than an unconfirmed study by an unknown source.
_________________
Jim
Site Administrator and long-term cancer survivor
1992 Astrocytoma grade 2, left motor strip
2005 Recurrence this time said to be an Oligodendoglioma grade 3, same location.
My Story Part 1: http://cancerforums.net/viewtopic.php?p=7350
My Story Part 2: http://cancerforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=8029
Blog http://jimhawkinsport.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chuck
New User
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 6
Location: NE U.S.
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:50 pm Post subject: A Source? |
|
|
OK, how about the Journal of the National Medical Association, Volume 82, Number 9 (Sept. 1990). Here's a quote from "Evolving Perspectives on the Exposure Risks from Magnetic Fields". "The experiment with human lung carcinoma cells verified the statement by Davis and Rawls that there is an increase in the growth curve of human lung carcinoma cells when exposed to positive polarity magnetic fields." "The results indicated that a significant decrease in the growth of these cells occurred between 6 and 144 hours when placed in close proximity to the north field of a 3.5 kilogauss magnet" (written Personal coummunication. Philip M. Lorio, February, 1988). And here's a link to a site mentioning just one of their inventions. It utilizes positive polarity magnetic fields.
http://www.unep.or.jp/ietc/Publications/INSIGHT/Sum-95/7.asp
Just a few that have duplicated some of their work. Dr. A. K. Bhattachura, West Bengal Clinic, India, Dr. Robert J. Morgan and Mrs. Hope Morgan, Delaware Clinic, Dr. Ralph Sierra, Director, Puerto Rico Scientific Research Laboratories, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, Dr. Yoshio Seki, Tokyo, Japan...
There are a few dozen more listed in their first book, "Magnetism and Its Effects on the Living System". You can look up more info on your own if you have an interest.
Last edited by Chuck on Sun May 06, 2007 4:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
brainman
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 3042
Location: Tennessee
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chuck
New User
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 6
Location: NE U.S.
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:51 am Post subject: Danger of man-made magnetic fields |
|
|
Here is an eye-opening article about the dangers of magnetic fields in our everyday environment. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/RofD1.html
Davis and Rawls found health hazards from AC electricity too, which they published in "The Magnetic Blueprint of Life". Again, the culprit is South pole magnetic fields. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Chuck
New User
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 6
Location: NE U.S.
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: Re: Negative magnetic energy |
|
|
| Don't think for a minute that cell phones have no relation to the escalating number of people with cancer and other health problems. Don't take my word for it though, take a look at what Dr. George Carlo, the scientist that was actually hired by the cell phone industry to study the radiation effects from cell phones, found in his research. For a thorough understanding of how cell phones can be dangerous, yet they're still claimed to be safe in the media, listen to the entire 1 1/2 hour radio interview with Dr. Carlo. It's shocking. http://www.emf-health.com/dr-george-carlo.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search 
Email Digests
Register to post
Profile 
Check private messages 
Log in
What is this ?
We subscribe to the HONcode principles. Verify here. All content and posts are copyright.
Thank you, Chuck. Much better information. At least now I know what your sources are. 
